So exactly what were the Clintons found guilty of and convicted for?

I've never said it was OK for Clinton to have sex in the Oval Office. The difference is that Newt was attempting to impeach his boss on immorality grounds when he, himself was guilty of the same act. That's called being a hypocrite. That's the point I'm trying to make, not judging right or wrong, just an excellent example of Hypocrasy that is so rampant in those that attempt to legislate morality.

To quote yourself 'commuting a sentence isn't a pardon', so what is it? A slap on the wrist? 'Bad, bad, Scooter! You lied, but that's OK. We all know you were covering for someone higher up.' You know the pardon is coming. To list all of Clinton's pardon's isn't defending what Bush has done or will do.

Bringing up the past does not explain, nor excuse the present. What Clinton did is done, and can't be undone. Try explaining what's happening now, in real terms, not in reference to what Clinton did. That's what I find so disingenous of the Conservative right. They come up with no reasons, just excuses. Or, in most cases, executive priviledge. Why won't they talk? Sounds like to me, they have something to hide.

Much has been written about Hillary Clinton and her secrecy, explain why the Bush Administration won't talk. Is that not secrecy? Oh, wait, I know: Executive Priviedge. Yeah, right.